Reformational Commentary on Ezekiel 38:13
"Sheba, and Dedan, and the merchants of Tarshish, with all the young lions thereof, shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?" (Ezekiel 38:13)
John Gill, writing in the 1700s, defaulted in his
commentary on Ezekiel 38:13
to the simplest interpretation and took these nations to refer to neighbouring lands of Judea
(imagining that they might be covetously requesting a share in the spoils rather than deriding Gog), with Sheba and Dedan of old being long
defunct Arabian states and Tarshish referring to some one or other Mediterranean city state (especially Carthage, a now ruined city in
modern day Tunisia), but none of these explanations hold weight for a near future (as of 2026) fulfilment as none of them possess a voice
that would either dare to speak against the Russian-Chinese axis or, Dedan excepted (if construed as Saudi Arabia), be heard as a spoil-sharing
supplicant by that axis.
We must conclude, therefore, that the three nations named here in Ezekiel 38:13 are not to be taken as literal countries the way the allies of Gog
in verse 5 and verse 6 are,
but as synonyms for modern day nations or a bloc of nations and as such have to be the subject of a determination on our part to classify
them either as sarcastically speaking to Gog (as his enemies) or as making a last-ditch request to him for participation in the expected
bounty (as his aspiring allies).
But first, we should inquire into the historicity of these countries.
Sheba and Dedan
Sheba and Dedan are the only nations in Ezekiel 38 lacking etymological association with a Genesis 10 patriarch; instead, they are named as
readily identifiable geographical regions.
Sheba was in what is modern-day Yemen, a desolate Islamic wasteland on the south of the Arabian peninsula, whereas Dedan is a city in modern-day
northern Saudi Arabia and is today known as al-Ula.
Note that although al-Ula is sited within a rich land, i.e., Saudi Arabia, the same cannot be said of Sheba in impoverished Yemen.
Plainly, neither of them today stand as thriving city states, yet both were known in antiquity as mercantile or trading centres, as was Tarshish,
and so in days of old all three named countries were the economic beehives of the then-developed world, and from the fact that Tarshish is prefixed
by "the merchants of", it seems clear that the sense is that their names are given as representative of economic powers, or a bloc of such,
contemporaneous with the assembly of the forces of the Russian-Chinese axis for the attack on the restored, economically thriving and safely
dwelling Israel.
Sheba is mentioned as a source of gold (i.e. material wealth) in the Messianic
Psalm 72:151 and appears to have been an historic synonym for material wealth
(whether accumulated by trade or as a source), while Dedan and Tarshish represent mercantile trade, and Tarshish additionally for maritime capability.
Tarshish
Tarshish, unlike Sheba and Dedan, is the name of an actual patriarch, the second of Japheth's four sons named in Genesis 10:4, and is the
recurring name of both a literal and a metaphorical nation throughout the Old Testament, as observed in historical records (i.e. Solomon's
receipt of exotic goods brought by the ships of Tarshish in 1 Kings 10:22) and in other prophecies apart from Ezekiel 38 (i.e. Psalm 72, Isaiah 2,
22, 60 and 66, as well as Ezekiel 27), always in connection to Tarshish being a major / the definitive seafaring nation, or a metaphor pointing to
such a nation or as encompassing all such nations.
The historical references in the Bible could be construed as applying to
Tartessos in Spain, or Carthage, or numerous other locations
around the
Mediterranean Sea known to be involved in trade with the Hebrews of old, but given the migration of the early nations and etymological red
herrings and dead ends littered all around the cradle of Gentile civilisations (i.e. from Anatolia outward in all directions), these references
are not wholly reliable in identifying Tarshish.
Rather, the Contemporaneousness Principle (as defined in the commentary on Ezekiel 38:2)
applied to the other prophecies invoking the name of Tarshish is the only way to clarify its identity
in Ezekiel 38 (if it be one nation at all and not a synonym for a bloc of nations), so that the Bible's historically referenced Tarshish of
Solomon's day was likely a Mediterranean city or state long since subsumed into other historical countries and perhaps with its original natives
having migrated far away from it, but that in the prophetic references it is an entity, either essentially descended from the Solomon-era Tarshish
or metaphorically called Tarshish because of its maritime heritage and its role as a modern financial hub; or perhaps even both understandings are
together correct.
Moreover, it is fair to say that, "the ships of Tarshish" is effectively a biblical meme (appearing in Isaiah 2:16, 23:1, 60:9), so strong is
the association between Tarshish of old and its maritime activities.
This seafaring entity, then, is also here in Ezekiel 38:13 an economic or trading hub, as emphasised by the term "the merchants of Tarshish".
The most striking prophetic reference to Tarshish occurs in Psalm 72:
"The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents: the kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts" (Psalm 72:10)
This is a prophecy of the future godly rulers of the nations reverently and joyfully serving Christ in the time of His spiritual reign, the
glorious genuine Philadelphian church age that lies in the very near future (as of 2026 - see my article,
Why the Age of Missionaries was NOT the Philadelphian Church Era).
Note that the "kings" (i.e. the rulers, not the royalty) of Tarshish in Psalm 72 are the very first future Gentile leaders named as serving and
honouring
Christ, and that those of Sheba (and "Seba") are named along with them, together forming the only three specifically named "nations" in this
Messianic prophecy, with the rest included in the next verse's generalisation ("Yea, all kings shall fall down before him: all nations shall
serve him").
This points to Tarshish, Sheba and Seba as either constituting (as three literal countries) or encompassing (as a cluster of nations)
the very first nations that will have received the promised godly rulership under the conditions
foretold in Daniel 2's and Daniel 7's destruction of the ungodly world order and its replacement by the righteous being in
authority 2; that is to say, the Kingdom of Daniel 7, so expected and longed
for by the English Puritans,
begins in these nations and grows from that starting point to fill the whole world as Daniel 2 foretells.
(Nevertheless, here in Ezekiel 38:13 these nations and their governments are still in an ungodly condition and have forsaken Israel's defence).
A second striking prophecy of Tarshish is in Isaiah 60:9, as follows:
"Surely the isles shall wait for me, and the ships of Tarshish first, to bring thy sons from far, their silver and their gold with them, unto the name of the LORD thy God, and to the Holy One of Israel, because he hath glorified thee." (Isaiah 60:9)
This is a prophecy of the "ships of Tarshish" being the first among the Gentiles to respond to the great transformation of Israel's fortunes
that ensue upon its return to the Messianic fold (not necessarily immediately, as no immediacy is implied, but in the aftermath of the conversion of
the Jews)3
and in my view can be interpreted as meaning that the largest exiled body of Jews in the
world will be located in "Tarshish" (both the archetype nation and, corporately, within its "young lions", i.e., its lesser allies), and that
these Jews will be in a state of notable prosperity.
Note that the restoration of these exiled Jews, now newly Christian, to their historical homeland is something Satan is desperate to prevent, hence all
the present day agitation from the Left for a Palestinian state.
The "ships of Tarshish" I take to refer not to literal shipping vessels per se conveying them, but rather either (a) to any means of transport
originating either within Tarshish or performing a Tarshish-of-old-like role in bringing the treasure that would be newly converted Jews back
to their ancestral and promised homeland, regardless of their modern day departure locale (even though I adhere to the theory that most of them
will begin their journey from within Tarshish and its allies) or (b) to the godly natives of Tarshish being instrumental in lovingly helping
the newly converted Jews in their midst to return to Israel because, for one thing, in Isaiah 23:1 and Ezekiel 27:25 the "ships of Tarshish"
are addressed as though possessing rational minds of their own (the inference being that the term applies not just to those seafaring men at
the helm of such vessels, but that the vessels themselves are symbolic of their entire nation), and for another, in Isaiah 60:9 there is a hint
that Tarshish (and its "young lions") shall be the first to embrace Christ as temporal ruler (through His godly servants being in power, this
being a very traditional Reformed and English Puritan understanding of the prophecy), a hint that is confirmed by Psalm 72:10 placing of the rulers
of Tarshish as the first Gentile government(s) to give hearty obeisance to Christ in the glorious era for His cause that still lies
ahead4.
Collating the biblical clues then, the following can be noted of the prophetic Tarshish:
- It represents the world's definitive maritime entity relative to the fulfilment timing of any prophecy it is mentioned in.
- It likewise represents the world's definitive financial hub.
- It will either be the sire of "young lions", that is, offshoot young nations in alliance with their parent nation, styled lions perhaps for their self-assurance, or alternatively (and in my view correctly), it is the leader of a "pride of lions" (i.e. strong and assertive) countries, amidst which are smaller emboldened nations in loyal alliance.
- In its present ungodly condition, it is a geopolitical enemy and opponent of Gog and his Russia and the nations allied with Russia.
- Its rulers will be the first, along with Sheba's and Seba's, to cheerfully submit to Christ during the very near future Philadelphian church age, because all three are named in the Messianic Psalm 72 (as detailed above) which applies to that very era, which, be it noted, begins in the global conflagration ensuing from the Ezekiel 38-39 Russian-led assault on Israel.
- Some time after the Jews worldwide turn to Christ at once and in unison, those not resident in the land of Israel will be transported by "the ships of Tarshish" in Isaiah 60:9, suggesting that most exiled Jews in the world will be found within the land of Tarshish and also within the homelands of its lesser allies (the "young lions thereof"), and note that today, as we near the time of this prophecy's fulfilment and the terrible world war that is annexed to it, most of the exiled Jews in the world reside within the United State of America5.
Tarshish in Ezekiel 38:13, therefore, can really only point to one interpretation, and that seems to be the New Tarshish, that is, America
or else "Anglo-America" (encompassing Britain as well) and its western allies (e.g. France, Germany, Canada, Australia, et al),
leaving "Sheba and Dedan" not as distinct additional allies set apart from the West, but as reinforcing metaphors for the West itself
because of their synonymity with wealth ("Sheba") and economics ("Dedan").
This naturally resolves John Gill's conundrum concerning the tone of the statement made to Gog in Ezekiel 38:13, "Art thou come to take
a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?"
Simply stated, that is not the voice of entreating aspirants wishing to join with Gog's enterprise, but rather is the voice of formal protest emanating from
the West, calling out Russia's true intentions on the world stage, for the West's own ulterior reasons.
Confirming via the Contemporaneousness Principle
Setting aside the foregoing deductions for a moment, it is rather straightforward to conclude that Russia's (and its allies')
main enemy at the time of Ezekiel 38's fulfilment will be the West as a bloc and so "Sheba, and Dedan, and the merchants of Tarshish, with
all the young lions thereof" minimally refers to the West in general, or as a whole.
But there is nuance to how Russia and China assess their adversaries within the West; as those familiar with Russian mainstream media's new and current
affairs programming will appreciate, Russia has a longstanding resentful antipathy towards
Britain6, going back at least to Stalin's reign if not preceding it,
and a like hatred of America, far outweighing any such attitude towards
the continental European nations, whereas China has long focussed on destroying America and taking revenge upon Japan for the World War Two
occupation of Manchuria.
Meanwhile, among the nations of the West, even though all of them are beholden (at government level) to a singularity, namely, the Scarlet
Beast system of Revelation 17 (i.e. the West's supranational globalist ruling elites in a hyper, but largely hidden, socialist ideological
configuration), which provides each western government with its marching orders, there is something of a pecking order along the following lines:
- America as economic and military powerhouse, and thereby de facto leader nation of the West.
- Britain, though in recent years increasingly economically weak, is nonetheless a banking hub, nuclear armed, with sophisticated intelligence services and home of many members and institutions of the Anglo American establishment that forms the kernel of the Scarlet Beast system.
- France, chiefly because of its nuclear arms.
- Germany, as the strongest European economy.
And so if we had no other clues as to the identity of "Sheba, Dedan and the merchants of Tarshish", we can conclude from the
Contemporaneousness Principle that they must, at a bare minimum, include the above-named nations.
We can now superimpose that conclusion upon the earlier more forensic study of the three named entities and find a matching "photo fit", a perfect
alignment.
A Determination on Sheba, Dedan and Tarshish
To reiterate once more, I assess the three named entities in Ezekiel 38:13 to constitute a metaphor7
referring collectively to the modern West.
Sheba and Dedan combined with "the merchants of Tarshish" under a single construction points to the world's premier economic and trading nexus,
with the suffix "the young lions thereof" not denoting the colonial offshoots of Tarshish-as-Britain, but describes the "whelps", the emboldened
adjuncts to the West's core, nations such as Japan, South Korea, perhaps even Taiwan.
That does not, however, alter the meaning of Tarshish elsewhere in prophetic Scripture from the Anglo homelands (especially America,
as can reasonably be argued is the case in Psalm 72:10 and Isaiah 60:9).
And it is this western - and western-aligned - group of nations, or rather, their ungodly governments, that shall call out and expose Gog's motives
for the coming invasion of Israel, not out of any genuine loyalty or concern for an Israel they are currently in the process of walking away
from (as of 2026), but for narrative-building and propaganda in the final days before the world goes to full scale war.
Objection: Dedan Represents Modern Saudi Arabia?
Some might see Dedan, as al-Ula, pointing at Saudi Arabia as a whole in the prophecy, and while it is perhaps plausible that the Saudis might
either (a) join with the West in condemning the Russian assault on Israel (a very risky protest if any prospect of a Russian victory appears
likely to them, which one must surmise will seem to be the case) or (b) berate Russia for not including it in its expedition (which is the
essence of John Gill's speculation on Dedan at al's statement in Ezekiel 38:13, albeit he mistakenly sees Gog as a Turk), the same plausible
explanation cannot apply to enfeebled and largely friendless Yemen (as Sheba).
Therefore, if this logic cannot apply to Yemen, then it also cannot apply to Saudi Arabia, a country which in any case is flirting with
joining the Russian-led BRICS monetary system.
Gog's Motives Exposed by the West; but Why?
Finally, the West (in its Scarlet Beast form of Revelation 17) and perhaps, but by no means certainly, any remaining Arab friends it has,
collectively speaks out
against the barbarian hordes led by Russia in array against Israel, but in a way that bespeaks loss of western influence in the Middle East.
Gone are the powerful sanctions that once the West could wage, because dried up shall be the Great River Euphrates
8, with – and here I am by necessity being very speculative – possible loss
of Petrodollar hegemony in the aftermath of the great darkness of the fifth of the Seven Last Plagues of Revelation 16 upon the western elites and
their
“Great Reset” plans unravelling, perhaps along with some kind of diversionary military sideshows in eastern Europe and the Far East, possibly
right up to war on the Korean peninsula, that may have stretched the western militaries to breaking point.
Regardless of specific reasons, all that the West and its allies will be able to proffer at this stage, bar initiating nuclear war themselves,
is a barrage of condemnation that they will not back up with military action, either through inability due to be
being stretched as described earlier, or through playing the "first strike" game, in which they would be seeking an occasion whereby Russia
and its allies would initiate a global war with the West, in which the Anglo party could pose as the "victim" (again, this is covered in the
last footnote to this verse herein).
Remember too the context of the Russian-led barbarian assault on Palestine: the collapse of the economies and living standards in Russia,
China, and the other barbarian rabble under the second of the Seven Last Plagues, which I strongly suspect will be related to the miscarriage
of their BRICS system.
That is to say, the East, led by Russia, will very probably consider this attack on Israel as necessary for rebooting their economies
and pacifying their disquieted populaces as a final preparatory step before proceeding to initiate World War Three.
FOOTNOTES
1. In Psalm 72:15 the wealth of Sheba is to fall into the hands of the godly in service to Christ in the time of His spiritual reign (which begins in the aftermath of the Ezekiel 38-39 events), meaning either the godly rulers shall dispose of the earth's surplus resources in advancing Christ's kingdom, or it denotes temporal prosperity for His children during that time (which shall be the genuine Philadelphian church age), or it means the labour and industry of godly humanity during the coming glorious era will be directed at advancing Christ's kingdom on earth, or perhaps it means all of the foregoing; certainly, all of the foregoing shall come to pass during the Philadelphian age because, in addition to the unstoppable success of the Gospel, God's temporal judgments upon the nations shall cease and so the judgment matrix of wars, pandemics, famines, paucity, etc., shall only be a memory, and eventually, something that future generations read about.
2. "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice" (Proverbs 29:2) - yet many professing Christians today insist there is no place for believers in temporal rulership. See also 2 Samuel 23:3, which constitutes a veritable mandate for the godly to be in power. That said, until the current beast system is destroyed by the Lord's near future intervention, Christians cannot govern because all temporal power today, though ordained of God, is mediated through the Satanic beast system of Daniel 7's fourth beast in its final form, that described in Revelation 17.
3. Because the Gog-Magog event leads to a fire being sent on Magog (Russia) and "on them that dwell carelessly (i.e. with no regard for their souls) in the isles" in Ezekiel 39:6, and because this fire can be well argued as being one and the same event as the "great hail" (terrible war) that erupts during Armageddon in Revelation 16's seventh and final plague, there is a plain argument for saying that the return of the natives to Judea will be delayed until that war ends.
4. Absurd as it may seem to the vast majority of professing Christians who have been beguiled by Jesuit futurism as the correct eschatological model, I do not take the view that Christ's return is imminent, but rather first must come the great advances for His Kingdom that are outlined in Isaiah 25-26 (which are epilogues to the dreadful judgments of Isaiah 24, itself pointing to the final of the coming Seven Last plagues of Revelation 15-16), Daniel 2, Daniel 7, Romans 11:15, Joel 3, etc.
5. Most Jews not resident in Israel today live in the United States of America, as
this article shows.
Breaking it down, the major locales are as follows (ignoring the nebulous "Palestine" entry in the Wikipedia list, as that is not a single country,
or indeed, any real country at all):
- United States of America: ca. 12 million (50% of of the "eligible" Jewish population in the world)
- France: ca. 7.5 million
- Canada: ca. 7.0 million
- Russia: ca. 6.0 million
- United Kingdom: ca. 4.1 million
6. Russian media "talking heads" routinely disparage and single out Britain above all the other western European nations for special vituperative threats, as I observed myself when I spent half a decade living in eastern Europe.
7. Just as Babylon in Revelation 17's prophecy is not the literal Babylon, there is no linguistic argument than can force the Sheba of Ezekiel 38's prophecy to literally refer to the Sheba of the Queen thereof!
8. The Great River Euphrates dried up within the sixth of the Seven Last Plagues of Revelation 16 is a metaphor for the
removal or ejection of all constraining influences exercised
by the West in the Middle East, since it is preparatory for the irruption into the region of "the kings of the East" as a final step in advance
of the Armageddon war whose preparations - not implementation (which comes in the seventh plague) - are also contained within the sixth plague.